Tactical Hunting

Which of these scopes would you get for a “tactical” rifle with a lot of recoil?
Out of these, which would you get? The rifle it’s going on is a modified savage 110fp in 300 win mag. The leupold vx III is a “hunting” scope, their tactical mark 4 line is just too much money. The nikon comes with side focus just like the leupold, has the same eye relief and features, and is over a $170 cheaper. Then there is the sightron which seems similar. Don’t suggest burris cuz there eye relief isn’t up to par.
http://www.swfa.com/pc-8773-2201-nikon-6-24×50-monarch-riflescope.aspx
http://www.swfa.com/pc-3373-307-leupold-65-20×50-vx-iii-30mm-riflescope.aspx
http://www.swfa.com/pc-12947-1512-sightron-6-24×50-siii-30mm-riflescope.aspx
So which would you pick out of these? keeping in mind that the nikon is a lot cheaper than the others. 800 is the max price limit. Thanks for your input.
Nikon, Leupold, and SIghtron all are very good makers
But each maker has many many different models.
Leupold VX-III and Sightron SIII are both considered “4 and a half star” scopes
The Nikon equivalent would be the Nikon Monarch GOLD.
Nikon Monarch is considered a “4 star scope” and is of comparable quality to the Leupold XV-II and the Sightron SII “Big Sky”
Of course, Nikon doesn’t make a “Monarch gold” in the 6-25x class
I’d personally choose the Sightron, it has the mildots which is a great feature.
Remington 700 SPS Tactical .223 Rabbit Hunting
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.